Legal Opinion

Norris v. Mitchell

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided January 9, 1998No. Record 970461PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SENIOR JUSTICE WHITING delivered the opinion of the Court.

In this appeal, we decide (1) at what point an order that sustained a demurrer and dismissed an action but gave the plaintiffs leave to amend within a certain period became final, and (2) whether the circumstances of this case required sellers of residential property to disclose to the purchasers the contents of a public document describing a restriction on the use of the property being sold.

The trial court decided the case by sustaining the defendants’ demurrer. Therefore, we accept as true the following material facts expressly…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Van Deusen v. SneadSupreme Court of Virginia · 1994
  2. Horner v. AhernSupreme Court of Virginia · 1967
  3. School Board v. Caudill Rowlett Scott, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1989
  4. Walt Robbins, Inc. v. Damon CorporationSupreme Court of Virginia · 1986
  5. Faison v. HudsonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1992

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. Bank of Montreal v. Signet Bank, Bank of Montreal v. Signet BankCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
  2. Cohn v. Knowledge Connections, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2003
  3. Hitachi Credit America Corp. v. Signet BankCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
  4. City of Virginia Beach v. HarrisSupreme Court of Virginia · 2000
  5. Lambert v. Downtown Garage, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2001

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API