Legal Opinion

Rothschild v. Foremost Insurance

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided August 31, 2009No. 2:09-cr-00144PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WOLFSON, District Judge.

This case involves Plaintiffs Zeev and Bracha Rothschild’s (“Plaintiffs” or “the Rothschilds”) claim against Defendant Foremost Insurance Company (“Defendant” or “Foremost”) seeking damages for an alleged breach of contract. Specifically, Plaintiffs seek the full amount of their policy limit as stated on the Declarations Page of the Foremost Policy. However, if the Court does not award Plaintiffs the full amount of the policy limit, Plaintiffs assert that, at a minimum, they are entitled to a pro rated percentage of the total loss. Additionally, Plaintiffs…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Kaucher v. County of BucksCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
  5. Alvaro Quiroga v. Hasbro, Inc. And Playskool Baby, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Nationwide Mutual Ins. v. CarisDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2016
  2. State Ins. Fund v. Selective Ins. Co. of Am.New York Supreme Court · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API