Legal Opinion
Warnick v. Booher
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided September 29, 2006No. CQ-2006-566PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ANSWERING CERTIFIED QUESTION OF LAW
LUMPKIN, Vice-Presiding Judge.
¶ 1 The Honorable Terence Kern, United States District Judge for the Northern District of Oklahoma, has certified the following question pursuant to the Revised Uniform Certification of Questions of Law Act, 20 O.S.2001, § 1601-1611:
Whether Oklahoma law — constitution, statutes, regulations, and case law — provides an Oklahoma prisoner with an expectation of finality with respect to a sentence such that a correction to the period of confinement cannot be made after the sentence has been discharged but while the prisoner…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. DiFrancescoSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Canady v. ReynoldsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1994
- Moore v. GibsonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 2001
- Warnick v. BooherCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
- Fields v. DrieselCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1997
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. SimpkinsOhio Supreme Court · 2008
- State ex rel. Mashburn v. SticeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 2012
- PAYNE v. KERNSSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2020
- Moss v. Oklahoma Department of CorrectionsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 2016
- Brown v. ParkerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.