Legal Opinion

Seiu Local 925, Appellant/cross-respondent v. Freedom Foundation, Respondent/cross-appellant

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided December 20, 2016No. 48522-2-IIPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohanson, J.

¶1 The Freedom Foundation (Foundation) submitted a Public Records Act (PRA) 1 request to the Department of Social and Health Services (DSHS). The Foundation requested disclosure of the names of childcare providers in Washington’s “Family Friends and Neighbors” (FFN) program and their “state contact” information. The Foundation’s expressed purpose in requesting the records was to correspond with the individual providers and to notify them of their constitutional right to refrain from union membership and fee payments. DSHS was ready to disclose the requested information. But Service Employees…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. State v. GunwallWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  2. State v. YoungWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Ino Ino, Inc. v. City of BellevueWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Ino Ino, Inc. v. City of BellevueWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Srcc v. Public Disclosure Com'nWashington Supreme Court · 1997

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lyft, Inc. v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Puget Sound Advocates For Retirement Action v. State DshsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018
  3. Wa Public Employees Assoc. v. Wa State Center For CCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017
  4. Wash. Pub. Emps. Ass'n v. Wash. State Ctr. for Childhood Deafness & Hearing LossWashington Supreme Court · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API