Asbury v. City of Roanoke
Roanoke County Circuit Court
1Opinion of the Court
By Judge Charles N. Dorsey
The pertinent facts are not disputed. The plaintiff has appealed the City Manager’s determination that his complaint is not “grievable.” The plaintiff is employed by the City of Roanoke as Sergeant in the Police Department. His superior, Lieutenant Beason, submitted a performance appraisal for Sergeant Asbury for the period from July 1,2002, through June 30,2003, with a score of 98.3. Plaintiff’s Exhibit 1. The performance evaluation policy requires that the score b¿ approved by two levels of supervision. Personnel Operating Procedure # 20, § (V)(7)(a) (hereinafter…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Ingles v. DivelySupreme Court of Virginia · 1993
- Board of Supervisors v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1975
- County School Board of York County v. EppersonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1992
- City of Danville v. FranklinSupreme Court of Virginia · 1987
- Lasus v. George Mason UniversityFairfax County Circuit Court · 1992
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Brito v. City of NorfolkNorfolk County Circuit Court · 2010
- Clark v. Roanoke CountyRoanoke County Circuit Court · 2014
- Ferguson v. City of ChesapeakeChesapeake County Circuit Court · 2015
- Gilliam v. Library of VirginiaRichmond County Circuit Court · 2009