Legal Opinion

Hollinger v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 15, 1990No. A90A0662PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

McMurray, Presiding Judge.

Defendant was convicted of two counts of armed robbery. Follow*650ing the imposition of sentence and the denial of his motion for a new trial, defendant appeals. Held,-.

1. Defendant contends the trial court erred in failing to suppress the identification testimony of a witness because the testimony was tainted by a suggestive photographic lineup. This contention is without merit.

“Convictions based on eyewitness identification at trial following a pretrial identification by photograph will be set aside only if the photographic identification procedure was so impermissibly…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Griffith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1984
  3. Price v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
  4. Harris v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
  5. Selbo v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1988

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Kendrick v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API