Kendrick v. State

Pope, Chief Judge.

Defendant Arthur Nathaniel Kendrick appeals from his conviction for robbery.

1. Defendant first argues there was not sufficient evidence for a rational finder of fact to find him guilty of robbery beyond a reasona*600ble doubt. Construing the evidence in the light most favorable to support the verdict, the evidence showed that on August 19, 1992, defendant entered an Amoco Gas and Food Mart located in Cobb County. He purchased a beer and then asked the store clerk for matches. When the clerk bent down to get matches for him, defendant reached into the cash drawer of the register,…