State v. Schmeets

MARING, Justice.

[¶ 1] Jeffrey Schmeets appeals a district court criminal judgment based on a jury verdict finding him guilty of tampering with a witness. On appeal, he argues there was not sufficient evidence to warrant his conviction. We affirm the district court criminal judgment because the record contains competent evidence which allowed the jury to draw an inference reasonably tending to prove guilt and fairly warranting Schmeets’ conviction.

I

[¶ 2] The undisputed evidence presented at trial revealed that Schmeets’ daughter, who did not live at Schmeets’ home, found items of drug…