Legal Opinion

Benkoski v. Flood

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided July 14, 1999No. 98-1972PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

This appeal and cross-appeal concern the relationship between the owner of a mobile home park and the owner of four rental mobile home units located in the park. The question presented is whether the owner of the units, Robert A. Benkoski, is a resident of the park for purposes of the statute and the administrative code chapter dealing with mobile homes, even though he does not live in the park. We conclude that with respect to the park owners, Mark A. and Kathleen M. Flood, Benkoski is a resident under the statute and code. As such, the Floods may not require him to remove his units from the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Green Spring Farms v. KerstenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Grams v. BossWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Hughes v. Chrysler Motors Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Voss v. City of MiddletonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1991
  5. State v. BuschWisconsin Supreme Court · 1998

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Benkoski v. FloodCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2001
  2. Andre De Garmeaux v. Dnv Concepts, Inc. T/aNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2016
  3. Kraft Foods, Inc. v. Wisconsin Department of Workforce DevelopmentCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API