Stuart v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ONION, Judge.
This is an appeal from a conviction for burglary with the punishment assessed at life under the provisions of Article 63, Vernon’s Ann.P.C.
The sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the conviction is not challenged. Appellant raises only one ground of error. He contends the court erred in “admitting evidence relative to a sawed off shotgun, together with ammunition consisting of buckshot and rifle slugs, which was found” in the automobile in which appellant was apprehended and arrested.
Officer Owen, a Corsicana City police officer at the time, testified that about 1:30 a.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Denham v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1968
- Chambler v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1967
- Roach v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1966
- Laube v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1967
- Carter v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1969
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
- Hamel v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
- Pulido v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
- Hamel v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
- Hamel v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979