Legal Opinion

Isquick v. Classic Autoworks, Inc.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided August 9, 1993No. 63120PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Krupansky, Judge.

Plaintiff-appellant B. Scott Isquick appeals from an order of the trial court granting defendants-appellees Ronald Fuller and Classic Autoworks, Inc. a new trial. The trial court determined a new trial was warranted since substantial justice had not been done in connection with the parties’ dispute involving the restoration of antique automobiles.

Plaintiff filed a three-count complaint in the trial court May 5, 1988 against defendants Fuller, individually and doing business as Classic Auto Works, and defendant Classic Autoworks, Inc. Plaintiffs complaint raised the following…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Rohde v. FarmerOhio Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Mr. Mark Corp. v. Rush, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. Robb v. Community Mutual InsuranceOhio Court of Appeals · 1989
  5. Krejci v. HalakOhio Court of Appeals · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Nilavar v. OsbornOhio Court of Appeals · 1998
  2. Nilavar v. OsbornOhio Court of Appeals · 2000
  3. Ta v. ChaudhryOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
  4. Brown v. Fukuvi USA Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2022
  5. Pravitskyy v. Halczysak, Unpublished Decision (12-24-2003)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2003

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API