Legal Opinion

Pravitskyy v. Halczysak, Unpublished Decision (12-24-2003)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 24, 2003No. 82295UnpublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION

{¶ 1} Defendants-appellants Steve and Donna Halczysak ("Steve" or "Donna") and Forest City Used Cars (collectively referred to as "the Halczysaks") appeal from a jury verdict in favor of plaintiffs-appellees Mykola Pravitskyy ("Mykola") and Olga Yelagina (collectively referred to as "the Pravitskyys") in the amount of $8,596. The Halczysaks raise several assignments of error relating to decisions made by the trial court. For the following reasons, we affirm in part and reverse in part.

{¶ 2} A review of the record reveals the following facts: The Halczysaks are engaged…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Grava v. Parkman TownshipOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Goldfuss v. DavidsonOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  3. State v. WillifordOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  4. State ex rel. Tubbs Jones v. SusterOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  5. O'Day v. WebbOhio Supreme Court · 1972

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. CSAHA/UHHS-Canton, Inc. v. Aultman Health Found.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2012
  2. Griffith v. Rielage, Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Franklin County, Civil Division2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API