Legal Opinion

Huseman v. Universal Credit Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 10, 1936No. 25955Published

1Per curiam

Defendant in error, as plaintiff, in this action, sued plaintiff in error, as defendant, to replevin an automobile, claiming default in the payment of the purchase price under a conditional sales contract, asserted to be owned by defendant in error by assignment from original payee. The parties will be referred to as they appeared in the trial court.

Defendant argued several assignments of error. They are: Eirst, that the trial court erred in permitting the introduction in evidence of the note and conditional sales contract, which were incorporated in one instrument, without showing payment of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Pierce v. C. I. T. Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  2. Neu v. J. I. Case Threshing MacHine Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API