Legal Opinion

Coleman v. Coleman

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided March 18, 1935No. 4719PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By ROSS, PJ.

Plaintiffs in error present in their brief only one question for the ernsideration of the court, involving the effect of §8023, GC, upon the conveyance.

When the deed was executed each of the grantors was over eighteen and under twenty-one years of age. The deed was executed after the present section was in force. §8023, GC, is as follows:

“All persons of the age of twenty-one years and upward, who are under no legal disability, shall be capable of contracting respecting goods, chattels, lands, tenements, and any other matter or thing which may be the legitimate subject of a…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People v. . GillsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1888

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Rosher v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  2. In Re Trust Under Will of DavidsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
  3. Jacobson v. LenhartIllinois Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Boyle v. KirbySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
  5. Allison v. AllisonOhio Court of Appeals · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API