Legal Opinion

Mihalitsas v. Howard

District Court, W.D. New York

Decided May 1, 2015No. 6:14-CV-06082 EAWPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ELIZABETH A. WOLFORD, District Judge.

INTRODUCTION

Plaintiff Bill Mihalitsas (“Plaintiff’) brings this action against Defendants Kenneth Howard (“Defendant Howard”) and “FNU” Dougherty (“Defendant Dougherty”) pursuant to 42 U.S.C. '§§ 1983 and 1985, alleging that Defendants violated his civil rights following his arrest on a vehicle and traffic violation on February 23, 2013. (Dkt. 1). On August 6, 2014, Defendants moved for partial dismissal of Plaintiffs claims under Fed.R.Civ.P: 12(b)(6). (Dkt. 3). For the following reasons, Defendants’ motion is granted, except Plaintiffs § 1983 claim…

2Cases cited18 opinions

Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
Ruotolo v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
Huey B. Wright v. Harold Smith and Thomas A. Coughlin, IIICourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

Muia v. MancinoDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2023