Legal Opinion
Golden v. State Board of Law Examiners
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided March 30, 1978No. Civ. K-77-677PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FRANK A. KAUFMAN, District Judge.
Plaintiff asks this Court to declare unconstitutional and to enjoin enforcement of Rule 10 of the Rules Governing Admission to the Bar of Maryland. 1 Jurisdiction exists under 28 U.S.C. § 1343(3), the jurisdictional counterpart of 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 2
On January 18,1977, Golden, who resides in Washington, D. C., 3 filed an application for registration as a candidate for admission to the Maryland Bar and a petition to take the Maryland Bar examination scheduled in July 1977. She received in response a letter from the Secretary of the Maryland State Board of Law…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Shapiro v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Haguer v. Committee for Industrial OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Doe v. BoltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Snowden v. HughesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Stalland v. South Dakota Board of Bar ExaminersDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 1982
- Piper v. Supreme Court of New HampshireDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1982
- In the Matter of JaddMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
- Opinion No. Oag 40-81, (1981), Wisconsin Attorney General Reports1981