Legal Opinion
Stalland v. South Dakota Board of Bar Examiners
District Court, D. South Dakota
Decided January 15, 1982No. Civ. 81-3046PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BOGUE, Chief Judge.
This action concerns the constitutional validity of S.D.C.L. 16-16-2 and 16-16-7 which provide that an applicant for admission to practice law in South Dakota must be a resident of this state. 1 Luther Stalland, the plaintiff, claims the residency requirement violates the privileges and immunities clause of article IV, section 2 of the Federal Constitution, and both the due process and equal protection clauses of the fourteenth amendment to the Federal Constitution. Plaintiff requests declaratory and injunctive relief. Jurisdiction exists under 28 U.S.C.…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Shapiro v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Dunn v. BlumsteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Sosna v. IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Doe v. BoltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Schware v. Board of Bar Examiners of NMSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Leonard J. Silver v. Juan Antonio Garcia, CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985
- Kathryn A. Piper v. Supreme Court of New HampshireCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1983
- Sargus v. West Virginia Board of Law ExaminersWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1982
- Galahad v. WeinshienkDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1983
- Piper v. Supreme Court of New HampshireDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1982
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.