Legal Opinion

Turner v. United States

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided April 30, 1997No. 2:93-cr-80981PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER’S 28 U.S.C. § 2255 MOTION FOR AN APPELLATE PROCEEDING AS IF ON DIRECT APPEAL

ROSEN, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Before the Court is the 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion of Petitioner Elmo Turner to receive an appellate proceeding regarding his sentencing because he was effectively denied the assistance of counsel when his attorney failed to file an appeal, despite Petitioner’s request for one. In response to this Motion, the Court ordered Petitioner and his attorney, Mr. Paul A. McKenna, to file affidavits which addressed whether or not Petitioner asked Mr.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Coppedge v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. Penson v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Satterwhite v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Rivera v. GoodeDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2008
  2. Edwards v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2003
  3. Turner v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API