Legal Opinion
Vicino v. Vicino
Connecticut Superior Court
Decided October 6, 1972No. File 168552PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSaden, J.
A final decree of divorce was entered on April 27, 1972 (Bordon, state referee), providing in part for the support of minor children as follows: “$100 a month for the support of . . . Dianne . . . during her minority and $100 a month for the support of said minor child Eobert . . . .”
The defendant husband, pro se, now seeks to terminate the support orders for Dianne and Eobert because both have reached eighteen years of age. He argues his claim on the basis of Public Acts 1972, No. 127, “An Act to Grant Pull Eights and Privileges to Eighteen Year Olds,” which provides in § 1 that “[ejxcept as…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- White v. WhiteSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
- Humphrey v. GerardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1910
- Michaud v. FitzrykSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1961
- City of Middletown v. N. Y., N. H. H. R. R. Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1893
- Harris v. Planning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1963
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Paul v. PaulSupreme Court of Virginia · 1974
- Sillman v. SillmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
- Fireman's Fund Insurance v. McAlpineSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1978
- Monticello v. MonticelloCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
- Kramer v. KramerCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1975
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.