Legal Opinion
Michaud v. Fitzryk
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided June 9, 1961PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMurphy, J.
The plaintiff, a tenant of the defendants, sustained injuries on May 7, 1956, when she tripped over a low wire fence which separated the lawn on their property from the public sidewalls:. During the trial, the defendants unsuccessfully sought to introduce in evidence a written statement which the plaintiff had executed in the presence of her husband on May 22, 1956, and which was contradictory to her testimony. Upon objection, the trial court ruled that the statement was not admissible because it did not contain the name and address of the person who took it, as required by the 1959 Public…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- E. M. Loew's Enterprises, Inc. v. International Alliance of Theatrical Stage EmployeesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1941
- Taylor v. MitchellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1868
- Horn & Brannen Manufacturing Co. v. SteelmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1906
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1946
- Schlagheck v. WinterfeldOhio Court of Appeals · 1958
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Schurgast v. SchumannSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1968
- Lavieri v. UlyssesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1962
- Little v. IvesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
- Gibson v. FullinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
- Neiditz v. Morton S. Fine & Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.