Legal Opinion
Pace v. Laurel Auto Parts, Inc.
Mississippi Supreme Court
Decided March 21, 1960No. 41373PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtArrington, J.
Mrs. M. "W. Pace and her minor daughter filed their claim against the Laurel Auto Parts, Inc., and its insurance carrier for benefits under the Mississippi Workmen’s Compensation Law for the death of their husband and father, M. W. Pace. The attorney-referee held that his death was not compensable, and upon petition for review by the full Commission, by a unanimous decision, it was held that his death was compensable. On appeal to the circuit court, the order of the Commission was reversed and the order of the attorney-referee reinstated, and from this judgment the claimants appeal to this…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Cardillo v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Heaps v. CobbCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1945
- Watson v. GrimmCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1952
- Swanson v. LathamSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1917
- Williams v. Travelers Ins. Co. of Hartford, Conn.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1944
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Tavel v. Bechtel CorporationCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966
- Western Elec., Inc. v. FergusonMississippi Supreme Court · 1979
- Hurdle and Son v. HollowayCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 1999
- Tiller v. Southern U.S.F., Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1971
- Dixie Products Co. v. DillardCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2000
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.