Legal Opinion
Steiner v. National League of Professional Baseball Clubs
District Court, C.D. California
Decided June 19, 1974No. Civ. 73-2523-FWPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION
WHELAN, District Judge.
In this action defendants Charles Feeney and National League of Professional Baseball Clubs, hereinafter National League, have moved the Court for dismissal pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The motion came on for hearing and was submitted for decision. The motion of defendants is treated as one for summary judgment by reason of the fact that matters outside the pleading have been presented to and have not been excluded by the Court. Defendants filed the affidavit of Charles Feeney in support of their motion and…
2Cited by6 opinions
- United Air Lines, Inc. v. McMannSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- William F. ZINGER, Appellant, v. Robert W. BLANCHETTE Et Al., AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
- Harris S. McMANN, Appellant, v. UNITED AIR LINES, INC., AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1976
- Marshall v. Hawaiian Telephone Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- 17 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1091, 17 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 8398, 1 Employee Benefits Ca 1664 F. Ray Marshall (Successor to Usery), Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. Hawaiian Telephone CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.