Legal Opinion

Posner v. Rockefeller

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 3, 1970PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGeorge L. Cobb, J.

This is an article 78 proceeding, in the nature of mandamus, in which the petitioners seek a judgment directing the Governor, the Director of the Budget and the Comptroller, the respondents herein, to expend no further moneys in accordance with certain provisions of the State Purposes Budget, the Local Assistance Budget, the Capital Construction Budget and the Supplemental Budget (L. 1969, chs. 48, 49, 50 and 340). The petitioners bring this proceeding as *29members of the New York State Assembly and as taxpayers and citizens of this State.

This proceeding was commenced originally in Supreme…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Flast v. CohenSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Doolittle v. . Supervisors of Broome CountyNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
  3. Schieffelin v. Valentine KomfortNew York Court of Appeals · 1914
  4. People v. TremaineNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
  5. Bull v. StichmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Department of Administration v. HorneSupreme Court of Florida · 1972
  2. Dunne v. HarnettNew York Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Saxton v. CareyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API