Legal Opinion

State v. Tindall

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided November 15, 1872PublishedCited by 4 opinions

On certiorari. In matter of taxation.

1Opinion of the CourtWoodhull, J.

It is insisted that the assessment brougnt up by this writ ought to be set aside as to the prosecutors, because, in the first place, the assessor failed to require of them sworn statements as to the actual value of their taxable property.

In support of this objection, we are referred to that part of the eighth section of the tax law of 1866, (Nix. Dig. 952,)* which provides that the assessor shall annually ascertain, by diligent inquiry, and by the oath or affirmation of the persons to be assessed, and, if necessary, of other persons, according to the best of his ability, and according to his…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. D., L. & WR CO. v. City of HobokenNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
  2. Village of Ridgefield Park v. BERGEN CO. BD. OF TAXATIONNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960
  3. Calloway v. Wildwood CrestNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
  4. Snyder v. Township of SpartaNew Jersey Tax Court · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API