Legal Opinion

Fleming v. Stansell

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 30, 1896PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error from Eastland. Tried below before Hon. D. K. Scott, Special Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

STEPHENS, Associate Justice.

— J. C. Stansell caused a stock of furniture belonging to J. E. Pritchard to be attached for debt due him from Pritchard. J. R. Fleming claimed the property and obtained possession thereof under affidavit and bond as provided by statute in such cases. He also intervened in the original attachment suit and sought to enjoin the proceeding for the trial of the rights of property, claiming to be a partnership creditor of Stansell & Pritchard, and as such entitled to an equitable lien on the property attached.

This contention, which prevailed in the trial court, was…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Aultman & Taylor Co. v. HefnerTexas Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Green v. ConradSupreme Court of Missouri · 1893
  3. Stansell v. FlemingTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Hamilton v. Van HookTexas Supreme Court · 1862
  5. Masterson v. GoodlettTexas Supreme Court · 1877

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Patten v. Hill CountyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
  2. Marmarth School District No. 12 v. HallNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API