Chicago General Railway Co. v. Kluczynski
Appellate Court of Illinois
Assumpsit.—Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook County; the Hon. Farlin Q. Ball, Judge, presiding.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Sears
This cause was pending in the Superior Court upon an appeal from the judgment of a justice of the peace.
When reached for trial in the Superior Court, the defendant there, appellant here, ivas not represented. The hearing was ex parte. Appellee was the only witness. His testimony consisted only of a statement of the amount owing from appellant to him, without giving any information as to the grounds of obligation. In other words, it was merely the conclusion of the witness that defendant was indebted. The entire evidence consisted of the following.
“ Q. Does the defendant owe you any money ? ”…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Barrett v. HinckleyIllinois Supreme Court · 1888
- Queen Insurance v. Dearborn Savings, Loan & Building Ass'nIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
- McGeoch v. HookerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1882
- Hollst v. BruseAppellate Court of Illinois · 1897