Legal Opinion

Mendez-Jorge v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 21, 2014No. Nos. 5D13-2714, 5D13-2716PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCohen, J.

In this consolidated appeal, Appellants, Arturo Mendez-Jorge and Mayra Rodriguez-Cabrera, appeal their judgments and sentences for trafficking in cannabis, possession of a place for trafficking, theft of electricity, and possession of paraphernalia. Appellants pleaded no contest to the charges, reserving their right to appeal the order denying their dispositive motions to suppress evidence found in their home upon execution of a search warrant. On appeal, they argue that the law enforcement officers who executed the search warrant violated the “knock and announce” rule by failing to give…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Hudson v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  3. United States v. BanksSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  4. Richardson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
  5. Kellom v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Falcon v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
  2. Saulsberry v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API