United States v. James Hall Fendley
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1DissentGodbold, Circuit Judge
With deference, I must dissent. I think that admission into evidence of Exhibit 9 — 108, the computer printout, was reversible error.
The printout lists 139 agents and for each shows, among other data, what was identified as the current balance owed by him to the company. These are subtotalled for 14 agencies and totalled for the Fendley division (in the amount of $179,084.41).
The majority acknowledge that the requirements of the Business Records Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1732, were not met, but hold that the failure is to be overlooked because the defendant’s objection was not sufficient.1
While the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. GraysonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948
- Standard Oil Co. v. MooreCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
- Wheeler v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1954
- United States v. Richard Allen De GeorgiaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
- United States v. Mitchell Miller, Susan McDuffie Weeks, and John Henry McDuffieCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.