Legal Opinion

Federal Deposit Insurance v. Mintz

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided December 18, 1996No. Civil Action No. 95-4708 (NHP)PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

POLITAN, District Judge.

This matter involves the application of New Jersey’s entire controversy doctrine (“the ECD”), a doctrine that to most members of the bar remains an enigma wrapped within a mystery. Defendants in this action, Jeffrey S. Mintz, Administrator c.t.a. for the Estate of Stephen J. Domenichetti, Robert J. Devlin, Raymond A. Hook, Domenichetti, Devlin & Hook, and Domenichetti & Hook (hereinafter “Defendants”), have moved for summary judgment under the ECD, claiming that this action against them is precluded because of two prior actions in which they should have been joined.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Cogdell v. Hospital Center at OrangeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1989
  2. DiTrolio v. AntilesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
  3. Wm. Blanchard Co. v. Beach Concrete Co., Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977
  4. Circle Chevrolet Co. v. Giordano, Halleran & CieslaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
  5. Mystic Isle Development Corp. v. Perskie & NehmadSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Nubenco Enterprises, Inc. v. Inversiones Barberena, S.A.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API