Cusack v. Southern Ry. Co.
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Before Mauedin, J., Dorchester, October term, 1920. Action by Frank Cusack against Southern Railway Co. et al. From order of dismissal plaintiff appeals. cites: Case should not have been dismissed: 21 S. C. 143; 35 S. C. 421. Brickman Way.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Mr. Justice Cothran.
Action for claim and delivery of personal property, commenced September 13, 1918. Appeal is from an order of discontinuance dated October 20, 1920.
The suit was instituted by R. Lon Weeks, as plaintiff’s attorney. On March 24, 1920, Weeks signed a statement to the effect that his connection with the case as plaintiff’s attorney had been severed. The plaintiff then engaged Jacob Moorer in his stead. The latter attorney does not appear to have notified defendants’ attorneys of his connection with the casé; certainly no order was ■…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Thornton v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1941
- Duncan v. DuncanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1925
- White v. HarbySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1935
- McComas v. RossCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2006