Legal Opinion · Dissent

McComas v. Ross

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided February 21, 2006No. 4084Published

1DissentAnderson, J.

I respectfully dissent. I disagree with the reasoning and analysis of the majority. The judge’s decision to dismiss McComas’s case for failure to prosecute was a proper exercise of discretion. I VOTE to AFFIRM.

FACTUAL/PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

McComas and Ross were involved in a car accident on December 13, 1999. McComas initiated this action, and the case was number fifteen on the jury trial roster for the court week which began on Tuesday, September 7, 2004. The case was called to trial at 2:00 p.m. on the afternoon of September 8.

McComas was not present when the trial began. Her attorney…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Small v. MungoSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1970
  2. Crestwood Golf Club, Inc. v. PotterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
  3. Mende v. Conway Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
  4. Collins Ex Rel. Quality Processing, Inc. v. SigmonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1989
  5. State v. AtkinsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1890

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API