Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Mason v. State

Utah Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1982No. 17744Published

1ConcurrenceHowe, Justice

I concur in the majority opinion. I believe that the word “accepting” found in U.C.A., 1943, § 36-1-7 has a special and limited meaning as used there and has nothing to do with the acceptance of warranty deeds.

“Accepting” as used there means acceptance by the public of a common law dedication for a highway made by the owner of the fee. Acceptance is a necessary element of dedication. This is well explained in 26 C.J.S., Dedication, § 34(a) (1956) at 459, where it is written:

A dedication at common law, like a contract, consists of an offer and acceptance; and subject to some exceptions…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Whitesides v. GreenUtah Supreme Court · 1896
  2. People v. ThompsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Sowadzki v. Salt Lake CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Brown v. Oregon Short Line RailroadUtah Supreme Court · 1909
  5. White v. Salt Lake CityUtah Supreme Court · 1952

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API