Legal Opinion

Lemke v. Jander

District Court, S.D. California

Decided March 1, 2021No. 3:20-cv-00362Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RICHARD G. LEMKE, Case No.: 20-CV-362 JLS (KSC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S 13 v. MOTION TO DISMISS 14 GARY D. JANDER, (ECF No. 9) 15 Defendant. 16 17 Presently before the Court is Defendant Gary Jander’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s 18 First Amended Complaint (“Mot.,” ECF No. 9). Plaintiff Richard Lemke, proceeding pro 19 se, filed an Opposition to the Motion (“Opp’n,” ECF No. 11), and Defendant filed a Reply 20 in Support of the Motion (“Reply,” ECF No. 12). The Court took the matter under 21…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  4. Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API