Legal Opinion

Montana Auto Finance Corp. v. British & Federal Fire Underwriters

Montana Supreme Court

Decided December 16, 1924No. 5,574PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rankin

This is an action to recover upon a policy of insurance for loss caused by the confiscation of an automobile by Canadian officials. The facts alleged in the complaint material to the issues presented by this appeal may be summarized as follows: A policy of insurance was issued at Great Falls, Montana, by the defendant British & Federal Fire Underwriters of the Norwich Union Fire Insurance Society, Limited, to T. Deloli, insuring an automobile, sold to him under a conditional contract of sale by the plaintiff Montana Auto Finance Corporation, against loss by fire, theft or collision “while…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Ellinghouse v. Ajax Livestock Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Herbst v. LoweWisconsin Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Cummings v. Reins Copper Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Rand v. Butte Electric Railway Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Clark v. Oregon Short Line R. R.Montana Supreme Court · 1909

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Park Saddle Horse Co. v. Royal Indemnity Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Labberton v. General Casualty Co. of AmericaWashington Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Wilson v. Hawkeye Casualty Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Levine v. Accident & Casualty InsuranceCity of New York Municipal Court · 1952
  5. Mining Securities Co. v. WallMontana Supreme Court · 1935

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API