Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Cisse

Criminal Court of the City of New York

Decided November 18, 1996PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Charles A. Posner, J.

Defendants move to dismiss the information charging the defendants with trademark counterfeiting in the third degree (Penal Law § 165.71), failure to disclose the origin of a recording in the second degree (Penal Law § 275.35), and criminal possession of a forged instrument in the third degree (Penal Law § 170.20) on the ground that the information is defective (CPL 170.35 [1] [a]). Specifically, defendants argue that the information is insufficient on its face (CPL 100.40 [1]).

The factual part of the information states in part:

"Deponent * * * observed…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. SyllaCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1992
  2. People v. DioufCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1992
  3. People v. AbdulCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1993
  4. People v. BorrielloNew York Supreme Court · 1992

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. MontanezCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1998
  2. People v. EnsleyCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1999
  3. People v. KaneCriminal Court of the City of New York · 2006
  4. People v. SantiagoCriminal Court of the City of New York · 2005
  5. People v. ThiamCriminal Court of the City of New York · 2001

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API