Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Abdul

Criminal Court of the City of New York

Decided March 16, 1993PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Harvey Glasser, J.

Defendant Eiob Abdul is charged with acting as a general vendor without a license in violation of Administrative Code *512of the City of New York § 20-453. The defendant now moves to dismiss for facial insufficiency.1

Administrative Code § 20-453 provides: "License required. It shall be unlawful for any individual to act as a general vendor2 without having first obtained a license in accordance with the provisions of this subchapter, except that it shall be lawful for a general vendor who hawks, peddles, sells or offers to sell, at retail, only newspapers,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. SyllaCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1992
  2. People v. DioufCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1992

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. People v. GonzalezAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2000
  2. People v. CisseCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1996
  3. People v. NieneCriminal Court of the City of New York · 2005
  4. People v. MansonCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1997
  5. People v. MontanezCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1998

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API