Legal Opinion

Borger v. Mineral Wells Clay Products Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 22, 1935No. 1389PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FUNDERBURK, Justice.

A. P. Borger, a resident of Hutchinson county, commanded by citation duly issued and served to appear before the district court of Palo Pinto county, the 5th day of March, 1934, to answer in a civil suit, employed attorneys residing in Amarillo, Potter county, to represent him. Said attorneys on Saturday, March 3, 1934, transmitted by mail plea of privilege in due and proper form. The letter of transmittal was addressed to Hon. J. A. Brewer, clerk of the district court, Mineral Wells, Tex. It was received at Palo Pinto and filed March 6, 1934, at 1:30 p. m. Previously, and…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Holliday v. HollidayTexas Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Houston & T. C. R. R. Co. v. BurkeTexas Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Thomas v. WomackTexas Supreme Court · 1855
  4. Farmers' Gas Co. v. CalameCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
  5. Lanius v. v. ShuberTexas Supreme Court · 1890

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Craddock v. Sunshine Bus Lines, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Brazos River Conservation & Reclamation Dist. v. HarmonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1944
  3. Hartt v. HarttWyoming Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Strayhorn v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1958
  5. United Farm Workers Organizing Committee v. La Casita Farms, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1968

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API