Legal Opinion
Dey v. Blinken
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided August 11, 2025No. Civil Action No. 2024-0944Published
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA NILAY KUMAR DEY, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 24-00944 (AHA) v. MARCO RUBIO, et al., Defendants. Memorandum Opinion Nilay Kumar Dey brings this action under the Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”) and the Mandamus Act to compel various government officials to schedule a consular interview and adjudicate his and his family’s immigrant visa applications. The defendants move to dismiss the complaint, arguing that the Court lacks subject-matter jurisdiction to hear claims against certain officials and that the complaint fails to state a…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- FW/PBS, Inc. v. City of DallasSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.