Legal Opinion

Faurote v. Carr

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided October 29, 1886No. 12,759PublishedCited by 24 opinions

From the Steuben Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.

The question involved in this case, which -was a suit to set aside a conveyance alleged to have been made in fraud of the rights of creditors, arises on a special finding ■ of facts made by the court below at the appellant’s request.

The facts found are, that on the 25th day of February, 1885, William M. Carr was a resident householder of Steuben ■county, in this State, and that he was indebted to the plaintiff to the amount of $88.32, which sum, with the interest and attorney’s fees, aggregating $103.14 at the date of- the finding, remained unpaid. The total value of all property • then owned…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cavanaugh v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Burdge v. BolinIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Williams v. OsborneIndiana Supreme Court · 1884

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Taylor v. DuesterbergIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Phelps v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Blair v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Citizens Bank v. BolenIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Dumbould v. RowleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1888

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API