Legal Opinion

Bayfield Resources Co. v. Western Washington Growth Management Hearings Board

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided September 21, 2010No. 39411-1-IIPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtHunt, J.

¶1 Bayfield Resources Company appeals the Thurston County Superior Court’s denial of its petition for review of the Western Washington Growth Management Hearings Board’s (GMH Board) decision rejecting its petition to invalidate the Critical Areas Amendment under Thurston County Ordinance No. 13884, which excludes “certain critical areas,” I Administrative Record (AR) at 23, from the required density calculation for Rural Residential R-l/5 (one-dwelling unit per five acres) lands, including portions of Bayfield’s 700-acre property.1 Bayfield argues that (1) the superior court erred in…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Presbytery of Seattle v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Isla Verde International Holdings, Inc. v. City of CamasWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Honesty in Environmental Analysis & Legislation (HEAL) v. Central Puget Sound Growth Management Hearings BoardCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1999
  4. Freeburg v. City of SeattleCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1993
  5. Federal Way School Dist. No. 210 v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2009

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Preserve Responsible Shoreline, V City Of Bainbridge IslandCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API