Legal Opinion

Holt v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided August 29, 2002No. 00-CF-631PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RUIZ, Associate Judge:

Stephen A. Holt was indicted on one count of unlawful distribution of a controlled substance (heroin) within 1,000 feet of a “drug-free” zone and one count of unlawful possession of a controlled substance (heroin) with intent to distribute (“PWID”) within 1,000 feet of a “drug-free” zone. 1 In October, 1999, a jury found Holt guilty of possession of a controlled substance, the lesser included offense of the PWID charge, but could not agree on a verdict on either the PWID count or the distribution count. Upon motion by Holt’s counsel, the trial court declared a mistrial.

In…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Brown v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Blackledge v. PerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Ohio v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Menna v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lampkins v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
  2. Wilson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. Bruce v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API