Wilson v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
GLICKMAN, Associate Judge:
Jermaine J. Wilson was charged with armed carjacking and related offenses. He contends that the trial judge committed reversible error by refusing to enforce his right to an “acquittal first” instruction when the jury convicted him of the lesser-included offense of (unarmed) carjacking *1193without first acquitting him of the greater offense of armed carjacking (on which it ultimately deadlocked). Wilson further contends that double jeopardy principles bar his retrial on the armed carjacking charge.
We reject Wilson’s first contention because his trial counsel, informed…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Winters v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1974
- Parker v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
- Whitaker v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
- Wright v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
- Jones v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Thomas R. Jones v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015
- Williams v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2012
- Ronald O. Douglas v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2014