Ellis v. New York Life Ins. Co.
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtGardner, J.
The suit is for recovery on two life insurance policies under the total disability clauses' therein. The action of the trial court in giving the affirmative charge for the defendant is the only question here presented. These clauses and the salient features of the evidence appear in the report of the case.
The sums claimed were payable on the anniversary of the policies and conditioned upon the continued disability. As a condition to the right of recovery under these clauses the policies provided that the insured should have become “wholly disabled by bodily injury or disease so that he is and…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Travelers' Ins. Co. v. PlasterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
- United States Casualty Co. v. PerrymanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1919
- Aetna Life Insurance v. LasseterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1907
3Cited by13 opinions
- Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. BlueSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
- New York Life Ins. Co. v. TorranceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
- Protective Life Ins. Co. v. HaleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
- New York Life Ins. Co. v. McLeanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
- Protective Life Ins. Co. v. WallaceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.