Legal Opinion

Voiello v. Hoey

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided June 2, 1936Published

1Opinion of the Court

HULBERT, District Judge.

The action is to recover processing taxes paid pursuant to assessment under the Agricultural Adjustment Act 1933 (see 7 U. S.C.A. § 601 et seq.).

Before answer, the defendant moved to dismiss the bill of complaint (1) because the requirements of section 21 (d) (1) (title 7 U.S.C.A. § 623 (d) (1), have not been complied with, and (2) because the requirements of Revised Statutes, § 3226 (title 26 U.S.C.A. §§ 1672-1673) have not been complied with;

The first contention is overruled on the authority of Edwin Cigar Co., Inc. et al. v. Higgins (D.C. decided May 19, 1936) 14…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. ButlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. Edwin Cigar Co. v. HigginsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API