Legal Opinion

Edwin Cigar Co. v. Higgins

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided May 19, 1936PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HULBERT, District Judge.

Plaintiffs sue for the recovery of processing taxes paid pursuant to assessment under the Agricultural Adjustment Act 1933 (see 7 U.S.C.A. § 601 et seq.).

The ’ complaint, which was filed February 27, 1936, appears to be based on Revised Statutes, § 3226 (title 26 U.S.C.A. §§ 1672-1673), and alleges: That the taxes in question were assessed by the Secretary of Agriculture on the manufacture or processing of tobacco; that they were paid to the defendant, both assessment and payment having been prior to August 1, 1935; that because of the nature of the business, the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States v. ButlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. United States v. Felt & Tarrant Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
  3. United States v. Jefferson Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
  4. Rickert Rice Mills, Inc. v. FontenotSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  5. Gold Medal Foods, Inc. v. LandyDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1935

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Edwin Cigar Co. v. HigginsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1936
  2. Voiello v. HoeyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API