Legal Opinion

State v. Attardo

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided January 28, 1975No. 19951PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ness, Justice:

The appellant was tried and found guilty of possession of more than one ounce of marijuana with the intent to distribute. Seeking reversal, he contends that the trial judge erred in failing to charge that such possession must be knowing or intentional and by charging that the burden shifted to the appellant to. prove that he, in fact, had no knowledge of what he possessed.

The conviction was based on § 32-1510.49(b) of the South Carolina Code 1962 (1973 Cum. Supp.). That section reads: “It shall be unlawful for any person knowingly or intentionally to possess a controlled…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Morrison v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. State Ex Rel. Glantz v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1969
  3. State v. EllisSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1974
  4. State v. SolomonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1965
  5. State v. TaborySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1973

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. HernandezSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2009
  2. State v. BrannonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2010
  3. State v. MollisonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1995
  4. State v. BlackwellSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2017
  5. State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API