People v. Oliver
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
*1036The defendant’s contention that the evidence was legally insufficient to support his conviction is without merit. Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620 [1983]), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon our independent review pursuant to CPL 470.15 (5), we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Romero, 7 NY3d 633 [2006]).
After subtracting the periods of delay which were due to the defendant’s…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- People v. ContesNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- People v. RomeroNew York Court of Appeals · 2006
- People v. KendziaNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- People v. WorleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- People v. WallaceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- People v. JohnsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- People v. DunawayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- People v. WilliamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- People v. FlowersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.