Patel v. MacArthur
Oswego City Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Frank M. Klinger, J.
Petitioner, who claims to have dealt exclusively with the *105respondents on behalf of the partnership, commences this action for an order of eviction and a money judgment against the respondents in the amount of $6,000.
The question presented is whether an individual denominated as "managing partner” may be a proper party plaintiff. In the caption of the case at bar "Ramji D. Patel, Managing Partner” is the named petitioner. The body of the petition alleges that "Ramji D. Patel is the managing partner of a partnership which owns premises commonly known as…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Ruzicka v. RagerNew York Court of Appeals · 1953
- Stevens v. St. Joseph's HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
- Merrick v. New York Subways Advertising Co.New York Supreme Court · 1958
- Purfield v. KathraneCivil Court of the City of New York · 1973
- Scott v. Board or EducationNew York Supreme Court · 1969
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- New Greenwich Litigation Trustee, LLC v. Citco Fund Services (Europe) B.V.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- Kaplan v. First City MortgageRochester City Court · 1999