Legal Opinion
In the Matter of Petition of N. St. Power
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided March 30, 2004No. A03-836PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RANDALL, Judge.
This certiorari appeal arises out of decisions made by the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission to approve Manitoba Hydro as a future electricity resource and to approve a power-purchase agreement between Xcel Energy and Manitoba Hydro. Relator argues that the commission erred in (1) denying its request for a contested case hearing, and (2) failing to adequately consider the environmental and socioeconomic costs associated with the Manitoba Hydro Project. We affirm.
FACTS
Manitoba Hydro is a Crown (Canadian) Corporation owned by the Province of Manitoba, with capital…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Reserve Mining Co. v. HerbstSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Cable Communications Board v. Nor-West Cable Communications PartnershipSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Minnesota Public Interest Research Group v. Minnesota Environmental Quality CouncilSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- Vicker v. StarkeySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
- In Re the Solid Waste Permit for the NSP Red Wing Ash Disposal FacilityCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.