Legal Opinion

Gill v. Gill

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided January 9, 1933PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTerrell, J.

Appellee as complainant below brought suit against Appellant for divorce. Appellant as complainant then countered with a suit against Appellee for alimony. The two causes were consolidated on stipulation of the parties and on final hearing Appellee’s prayer for divorce was granted and appellant’s prayer for alimony was denied. This appeal is from that final decree.

The suit for divorce was predicated on extreme cruelty and frequent indulgence in a violent and ungovernable temper. The evidence on this point is in hopeless conflict but the finding of the chancellor is amply supported by the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Carlton v. CarltonSupreme Court of Florida · 1919
  2. Baker v. BakerSupreme Court of Florida · 1927
  3. Phinney v. PhinneySupreme Court of Florida · 1919
  4. Erdmans v. ErdmansSupreme Court of Florida · 1925
  5. Raborn v. RabornSupreme Court of Florida · 1921

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Aldrich v. AldrichSupreme Court of Florida · 1964
  2. Burger v. BurgerSupreme Court of Florida · 1964
  3. Hobbs v. HobbsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1962
  4. Reese v. ReeseDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1965
  5. Ringling v. RinglingSupreme Court of Florida · 1935

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API